googled3332e47a38e543b.html

REAL CLEAR RELIGION

Culture, Christianity, Catholic Dogma & The Death Of The West

Culture, Christianity, Catholic Dogma & The Death Of The West

Open Book
Keyboard
MacBook
Crocus
Blueberries
Light Bulb
Reed

CATHOLIC MARRIED COUPLE FIGHTS FOR RIGHT TO BE REFERRED TO AS MARRIED

If homosexuals cannot legally get "married"--they will wage a war of semantics and render any reference to the word "marriage" obsolete. Have you noticed that certain newspapers have begun calling all couples "partners" leaving one guessing if the article is about two females, two males, or a traditional married husband and wife? It reminds me of the feminists' attempt to refer to every woman as "Ms." rather than "Mrs" and "Miss" so as to obfuscate whether or not a woman was "attached" to a man or not. As we all know from the abortion battle semantics is critical in the battle between good and evil--and here is a married Catholic couple in the midst of a legal struggle to be truthfully referred to as MARRIED.

From Scotsman: A Devout Catholic couple who object to their marital status being listed alongside civil partnerships have won the first round in an employment tribunal action against Scotland's largest police force.

Lucille and Frank McQuade, who have been married for 26 years, claim that Strathclyde Police is guilty of religious discrimination after altering its civilian employee records to change their status from "married" to "married/civil partnership".

Speaking after an earlier tribunal hearing, Mrs McQuade, 46, who until recently worked as a CID clerk with the force, said: "The concept of homosexuality is not compatible with our faith." Mrs McQuade, now with the Catholic Parliamentary Office and Fertility Care Scotland, which teaches natural family planning, added: "We find it offensive that people don't know if we are married or civil partners."

Mr McQuade, 49, a communications officer with the force, added that no slur was intended on the gay community.

The couple, from Motherwell, told the original tribunal hearing in Glasgow last October that the change to their "true legal and religious status" amounted to sex discrimination and religious discrimination.

The McQuades argued also that they had been treated less favourably than single colleagues who have not been affected by any change in status.

Strathclyde Joint Police referred to guidance on sexual orientation by Acas, which stated that "outing" an individual's sexual orientation against their wishes or without their clear permission was inappropriate and a breach of privacy.

They denied that the McQuades had suffered any detriment and urged the tribunal to throw out the case or, alternatively, to order the couple to each pay a £500 deposit as a condition of pursuing their claims.

However, the guidance further suggested avoiding making people identify themselves as either married or in a civil partnership as in most situations they were treated the same, so there was no need to identify them separately.

Jane Garvie, the employment judge, noted that the Acas advice was just "guidance", and she could not reach the view that the case had little reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal yesterday ruled the case should go ahead without the need for a deposit being paid.

Peter Kearney, spokesman for the Catholic Media Office, said: "When civil partnerships were introduced, politicians stressed they were not the same as marriage. It is absurd that a public body cannot list these separately." But Tony Grew, the editor of the Pink News, a campaigning newspaper for the gay community, said:

"Many people in the police, and the vast majority of people they serve, are proud of the fact that their gay and lesbian colleagues no longer have to hide in the shadows. It seems this couple are not among them.

"They are entitled to their view, but in 2008 it looks like the sad relic of a prejudice that has no place in modern Scotland."


Wow, now marriage is just a sad relic of prejudice to the enlightened post-modern mind, and only those who are homosexuals are justified in being proud of their lifestyle.

"The case will go ahead before an employment tribunal at a later date."